About the CBILLS Discussion Paper Series



The ILC provides a unique opportunity for legislative staff and officers to gain insights into best practices and current approaches to the legislative process and public sector leadership, as well as to the various innovative governance measures that the mission country is known for. It also serves as a platform for information exchange where participants can discuss and share best practices, innovations, and reforms, allowing cross-fertilization of ideas.

To meaningfully harness the knowledge generated during the course, the development of a discussion or analytical paper that delves into any topics and knowledge exchange sessions delivered, offers a valuable opportunity to capitalize on the course learnings and contribute to the area or field. This series aims to synthesize lessons drawn from the resource speakers’ presentations, dialogue with legislative counterparts, participants’ reports, and offer a critical analysis of the elements observed- whether in the legislative system and operations, policy reform, or innovative governance- that the Philippines may choose to adopt, adapt, or rethink.

This paper series not only validates the importance of the ILC as an educational and capacity-building initiative but also demonstrates its practical value in advancing legislative excellence and policy discourse. By bridging the gap between knowledge and application, it reinforces the ILC’s role as a catalyst for institutional growth and policy excellence.



Lessons from Japan: Reflections on Lawmaking under Parliamentary and Presidential Systems

Sheena Carmina V. Mateo
15 May 2026

The conference, organized by the Development Academy of the Philippines (DAP)’s Capability Building on Innovative Leadership for Legislative Staff (CBILLS) Program, with the theme “Legislating for Inclusive, Participatory, and Responsive Governance,” could not have come at a more opportune time. As the country faces rising tensions and the government faces stricter public scrutiny following the unravelling of irregularities and corruption on public flood-control projects, the age-old question, “Where do our taxes go?” seems to have been answered in a way no taxpayer would have liked. Continue reading…